Quantifying social group and political polarization in on-line platforms

[ad_1]

1.

Sunstein, C. #Republic: Divided Democracy within the Age of Social Media (Princeton Univ. Press, 2018).

2.

Iyengar, S. & Hahn, Okay. S. Purple media, blue media: proof of ideological selectivity in media use. J. Commun. 59, 19–39 (2009).

Article  Google Scholar 

3.

van Alstyne, M. & Brynjolfsson, E. Digital communities: world villages or cyberbalkanization? In Proc. Global Convention on Data Techniques 5 https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis1996/5 (1996).

4.

van Dijck, J. The Tradition of Connectivity: A Crucial Historical past of Social Media (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013).

5.

McLuhan, M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Guy (Univ. of Toronto Press, 1962).

6.

Farrell, H. The effects of the web for politics. Ann. Rev. Pol. Sci. 15, 35–52 (2012).

Article  Google Scholar 

7.

Conover, M. D. et al. Political polarization on Twitter. Proc. Intl AAAI Conf. Internet Soc. Media 133, 89–96 (2011).

Google Scholar 

8.

Bail, C. A. et al. Publicity to opposing perspectives on social media can building up political polarization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9216–9221 (2018).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

9.

Martin, T. community2vec: vector representations of on-line communities encode semantic relationships. In Proc. 2d Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science 27–31 (2017).

10.

Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D. & Zou, J. Phrase embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E3635–E3644 (2018).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

11.

Bolukbasi, T., Chang, Okay.-W., Zou, J. Y., Saligrama, V. & Kalai, A. T. Guy is to laptop programmer as girl is to homemaker? Debiasing phrase embeddings. Adv. Neural Inf. Procedure. Syst. 29, 4349–4357 (2016).

12.

Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J. & Narayanan, A. Semantics derived mechanically from language corpora comprise human-like biases. Science 356, 183–186 (2017).

ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

13.

Kozlowski, A. C., Taddy, M. & Evans, J. A. The geometry of tradition: examining the meanings of sophistication thru phrase embeddings. Am. Soc. Rev. 84, 905–949 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

14.

Shi, F., Shi, Y., Dokshin, F. A., Evans, J. A. & Macy, M. W. Hundreds of thousands of on-line e book co-purchases expose partisan variations within the intake of science. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0079 (2017).

Article  Google Scholar 

15.

Del Vicario, M. et al. Echo chambers: emotional contagion and crew polarization on Fb. Sci. Rep. 6, 37825 (2016).

ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

16.

Pariser, E. The Filter out Bubble: What the Web is Hiding from You (Penguin, 2011).

17.

Flaxman, S., Goel, S. & Rao, J. M. Filter out bubbles, echo chambers, and on-line information intake. Public Opin. Q. 80, 298–320 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

18.

Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L. A. Publicity to ideologically various information and opinion on Fb. Science 348, 1130–1132 (2015).

ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

19.

DiMaggio, P., Evans, J. & Bryson, B. Have American’s social attitudes turn into extra polarized? Am. J. Sociol. 102, 690–755 (1996).

Article  Google Scholar 

20.

Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A. & Bonneau, R. Tweeting from left to proper: is on-line political conversation greater than an echo chamber? Psychol. Sci. 26, 1531–1542 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

21.

Adamic, L. A. & Look, N. The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they weblog. In Proc. third Global Workshop on Hyperlink Discovery 36–43 (2005).

22.

An Exam of the 2016 Voters, In accordance with Validated Citizens https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-voters/ (Pew Analysis Heart, 2018).

23.

Hawley, G. Making Sense of the Alt-Proper (Columbia Univ. Press, 2017).

24.

Simmel, G. Warfare and the Internet of Crew Affiliations (Loose Press, 1955).

25.

Breiger, R. L. The duality of individuals and teams. Social Forces 53, 181–190 (1974).

Article  Google Scholar 

26.

Bourdieu, P. Difference: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Style (Routledge, 1984).

27.

Crenshaw, Okay. W. On Intersectionality: Crucial Writings (The New Press, 2017).

28.

Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M. & Blackburn, J. The Pushshift Reddit dataset. In Proc. Global AAAI Convention on Internet and Social Media 14, 830–839 (2020).

29.

Reddit privateness coverage Reddit https://www.redditinc.com/policies/privacy-policy (2021).

30.

Kumar, S., Hamilton, W. L., Leskovec, J. & Jurafsky, D. Neighborhood interplay and warfare on the net. In Proc. 2018 International Large Internet Convention 933–943 (2018).

31.

Waller, I. & Anderson, A. Generalists and consultants: the use of group embeddings to quantify task range in on-line platforms. In Proc. 2019 International Large Internet Convention 1954–1964 (2019).

32.

Levy, O. & Goldberg, Y. Dependency-based phrase embeddings. In Proc. 52nd Annual Assembly of the Affiliation for Computational Linguistics 2, 302–308 (2014).

33.

Levy, O. & Goldberg, Y. Neural phrase embedding as implicit matrix factorization. Adv. Neural Inf. Procedure. Syst. 27, 2177–2185 (2014).

Google Scholar 

34.

Schlechtweg, D., Oguz, C. & im Walde, S. S., 2d-order co-occurrence sensitivity of skip-gram with damaging sampling. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02479 (2019).

[ad_2] #Quantifying #social #group #political #polarization #on-line #platforms https://mycyberbase.com/technology/quantifying-social-group-and-political-polarization-in-on-line-platforms/?feed_id=18298&_unique_id=64907416ef136 #Technology